The revenue system that holds after the consultant leaves.
Operator-led revenue operations consulting for mid-market and PE-backed B2B. Rule27 diagnoses the structural problems across forecasting, GTM alignment, tech stack, and data governance, then stays to operationalize the fix.
Revenue operations breaks in predictable ways. The forecast nobody trusts. Marketing, sales, and success each running their own numbers. A tech stack bought one tool at a time that now fights itself. Data so fragmented that every board meeting starts with an argument about whose figures are right. Most consultants will diagnose all of that, hand you a deck, and leave the hard part, actually fixing it, to you and whichever vendors you can line up.
Rule27 works as an operator, not an advisor who disappears at the recommendation. We diagnose the structural issues across the full revenue motion: how pipeline is defined and forecast, where marketing and sales fall out of alignment, which systems are the source of truth and which are noise, and how data governance either supports decisions or undermines them. Then we design the architecture that resolves it and stay to implement it, because a RevOps fix that lives only in a document changes nothing.
The outcome is a revenue system the leadership team trusts: a forecast that means something, stages that carry real probability, systems that agree with each other, and data clean enough to run the business on. Because the same team runs your growth programs and your engineering, the RevOps architecture and the tools it depends on get built together, under one owner, instead of thrown across a gap between a strategy firm and an implementation shop.
Built to deliver.
Forecast integrity
Pipeline stages redefined to carry real probability, so the forecast the board sees is one the team can actually defend.
GTM alignment
Marketing, sales, and success brought onto one definition of pipeline, one set of numbers, and one hand-off that does not drop leads.
Tech stack consolidation
An honest audit of what each tool earns its place doing, what overlaps, and what to cut, then a stack that acts as one system.
Data governance
Source-of-truth decisions, ownership, and hygiene rules so the numbers stop being an argument and start being a decision input.
Operator-led implementation
We do not stop at the recommendation. We build the architecture we designed, inside your systems, with your team.
Executive Advisory engagement model
Senior operators engaged under the Executive Advisory model, embedded in your operating rhythm rather than parachuted in for a deck.
Knowledge transfer
We build the muscle in your team as we go, so the system holds and the engagement ends on purpose rather than becoming a dependency.
See how RevOps Consulting would work for your business.
Book a consultationThe engagement.
Diagnose
We map the full revenue motion and name the structural problems across forecasting, alignment, stack, and data, including the ones nobody has said out loud.
Design
We architect the fix: stage definitions, system of record, hand-offs, and governance rules that resolve the root cause, not the symptom.
Implement
We build it inside your systems with your team, because a RevOps design that lives only on paper changes nothing.
Operationalize and transfer
We tune against real pipeline, build the muscle in your team, and hand over a system that holds after we leave.
Priced like a product.
Consulting
$250/hr- Operator-led engagement under the Executive Advisory model, scoped to the diagnosis and the architecture.
Implementation
$25,000- Design plus hands-on build of the revenue architecture across your systems.
Managed RevOps
$4,000per month- Ongoing operation and tuning of the system once it is live, so it keeps holding as the business changes.
Not sure which tier fits? We will scope it with you.
Start with RevOps ConsultingAsked often.
How is this different from hiring a RevOps consultant?
Most consultants stop at the recommendation. We operate. We diagnose the structural problems, design the fix, and then build it inside your systems with your team, because a RevOps strategy that lives only in a document changes nothing.
Is RevOps the same as a Fractional CMO or Business Consulting engagement?
They overlap but solve different problems. RevOps is the revenue system itself: forecasting, alignment, stack, and data governance. If the gap is marketing leadership, the Fractional CMO line fits better. If it is broad company strategy, Business Consulting is the starting point. We will tell you honestly which one you actually need.
Who is this for?
Mid-market and PE-backed B2B teams where revenue has outgrown the systems running it: the forecast is not trusted, the teams disagree on numbers, and the tech stack fights itself.
Do you implement, or just advise?
Both, and that is the point. The same team that designs the architecture builds it, and because we also run growth and engineering, the RevOps system and the tools it depends on get built together instead of across a vendor gap.
How long does a RevOps engagement take?
The diagnosis is weeks, not quarters. Implementation depends on how fragmented the current state is, which we scope honestly up front so you decide with a real timeline rather than an open-ended retainer.
What happens when the engagement ends?
You own a system that holds. We build the muscle in your team as we go and transfer ownership deliberately, so the engagement ends on purpose instead of turning into a permanent dependency.